Skip to main content

Post content has been hidden

To unblock this content, please click here

KM
Master March 2015

Small wedding: Are RSVP's pointless?

KM, on May 15, 2014 at 8:52 PM Posted in Planning 0 24

My wedding only has an 80 person guest list...and that includes everyone getting a "plus one". At this point, I'm trying to shave costs a little, and with all of these "I'm not getting my rsvp's back" posts, I'm starting to think they are just super pointless. I'm trying to think of ways to shave costs, and I think that eliminating the traditional "rsvp" would be a good way to do that. Hell, I could start a Facebook chat with everyone on our guest list and just have them rsvp that way (tacky, I know...but super efficient because I can see who has seen the message and who hasn't).

What do y'all think?

24 Comments

Latest activity by KM, on May 16, 2014 at 9:19 AM
  • mscountry
    Master July 2014
    mscountry ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    If you want to save money you can have people RSVP by email but I still like the paper ones so I have the actual card and don't have to worry about a computer glitch happening.

    • Reply
  • Chantel
    Master May 2014
    Chantel ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Are you having buffet or plated meal? If plated, how will they get their selection to you? I only had 30 people at mine, and I got all but 2 back, and I sent those 2 a text message. If it isn't that important to you, then go for it. Just make sure you can track the replies and make sure everyone has FB of course, lol. If my mom would have been down, I would have sent e-mails and used those replies. Oh well!

    • Reply
  • Jae
    Master June 2014
    Jae ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I would do it so people know it's more formal instead of just a get together. If they were in a facebook chat, they might say they'll be there and then not actually show up. Just my experience from my brother's wedding, they did RSVP on a facebook group and were expecting 80 people and only had about 50.

    • Reply
  • KarenM
    Master November 2014
    KarenM ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    80 people is not such a small wedding. I would spend the extra couple of dollars on RSVPs. Most people will send them back. For those that don't, they won't respond on a website or by email either.

    • Reply
  • KM
    Master March 2015
    KM ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I was slightly kidding about the facebook chat, but great point Jae! I guess compared to all of the weddings I've been to/going to be at, ours is pretty tiny. I guess I'll spring for the traditional ones! I honestly haven't decided if I want buffet or plated...it's the same price, but plated seems a little fancy for what we're going for.

    • Reply
  • Celia Milton
    Celia Milton ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Eighty isn't really small. and you do need to know who is coming. I do love getting them too; a really pretty invitation is exciting!

    • Reply
  • MarianiBride
    VIP June 2014
    MarianiBride ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    We did an email rsvp and only 4 people have not responded it worked well for us!

    • Reply
  • L
    Dedicated August 2014
    LCC611 ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I'm having a small wedding with 30 people (including us). I'm going to have the people RSVP online or call us. The RSVP information will be with the invitation.

    • Reply
  • KM
    Master March 2015
    KM ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Wow. so I totally forgot to include us on the guest list. dumb.

    • Reply
  • Mrs. A & J
    Master December 2014
    Mrs. A & J ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I thought about going the email RSVP route. But then I remembered how much I LOVE getting snail mail, so I'll spend a bit more and have something to look forward to!

    • Reply
  • KM
    Master March 2015
    KM ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I do love snail mail...

    • Reply
  • Kaegurl
    Master June 2014
    Kaegurl ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    We're having 45 guests and went the invitation and RSVP route. Our wedding is very traditional and will include a plated meal, etc. so we wanted our invitations to set the tone/style of our event.

    • Reply
  • Pezzy
    Master May 2014
    Pezzy ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Kristen, the venue needs to know how many people to cook for, right?

    • Reply
  • Tiffany M. ( Tiffany P.)
    Master August 2012
    Tiffany M. ( Tiffany P.) ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    SIL had less then 40 people and she sent out invites and paper RSVPs.

    • Reply
  • KM
    Master March 2015
    KM ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Pezzy...of course! It's not like I plan on not getting people to RSVP at all...I'm just trying to think of better (cheaper) ways than snail mail.

    • Reply
  • Abby
    VIP October 2021
    Abby ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I just don't think the savings are worth it. Whatever invitations you get will probably already include RSVPs in the package, so you'd just be wasting them. And the postage won't even be $35 since you said 80 people - remember you only need as many invitations as there are households, not people. So what's the grand savings here, $15 in stamps?

    Something like going for chicken or pork over steak will save you a lot more than $15.

    Call me old fashioned, but I think a paper RSVP is important.

    • Reply
  • Annie & Javi
    Master October 2015
    Annie & Javi ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    How much can you possibly save with not having traditional RSVP cards? We are inviting 70 guests and will send out RSVP cards to everyone.

    Don't skimp out on the traditional RSVP, the online thing is tacky especially since you most likely won't be saving a huge amount.

    • Reply
  • Pezzy
    Master May 2014
    Pezzy ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    There is nothing tacky about an online RSVP. Ina. Modern world of convenience, doing something to make it easier on a guest isn't tacky. However, some people are better with the mailed cards. We invited 235 people. We did online and card RSVP. We got a majority back by card. Do whatever makes it easier for your guests.

    • Reply
  • Suzi
    Master June 2014
    Suzi ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Online RSVPs are biting me in the ass! I've gotten a few FB messages with questions asking how to RSVP. But the WW wedding website doesn't work with Internet Explorer so I've had that to contend with as well. I also put both our phone numbers as RSVP options. I've not heard much one either. We had an RSVP insert with the RSVP options. Apparently people missed the neon green, orange, or hot pink card. Granted I still have 3 weeks before my deadline, but I've only had 60 of the 211 respond at all.

    ETA: I wish I would've done snail mail RSVP.

    • Reply
  • Rachel DellaPorte
    Rachel DellaPorte ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I'd do the conventional RSVPs. You'll probably have to track some people down online, but I think most people will respond via mail. In the end, I think it will be easier for you to keep track of your guests.

    • Reply

You voted for . Add a comment 👇

×
WeddingWire celebrates love ...and so does everyone on our site! Explore how we embrace diversity

Groups

WeddingWire article topics