Skip to main content

Post content has been hidden

To unblock this content, please click here

Melissa
Savvy September 2011

church ceremony and NO RECEPTION. yes or no?

Melissa, on March 12, 2011 at 5:07 PM Posted in Etiquette and Advice 0 37

My fiancee and i have come to the conclusion that we will do the ceremony and NO reception. We were planning a small wedding in the 1st place about 60-70 guest we found a cheap reception hall $35 a plate open bar included and food! It was perfect but now we are thinking on just having the wedding and no reception. We save so much more money for honeymoon, and we just decorate the church and dont have to spend on decorating the place. My mother thinks its dumb! That nobody comes to the church, only family (which is true) she thinks i will regret it when only 15 ppl show up at the church and i only wear my dress for about 45mins. All i care for is wearing my dream dress, getting the blessing and having beautiful pictures. The reception is for the people not us.

What do you guys think? Will I be missing out?

37 Comments

Latest activity by Vicky, on July 19, 2019 at 9:40 PM
  • Cait
    Beginner June 2011
    Cait ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    You shouldn't feel like you have to have a reception just because others want you too. If you have a budget and a big reception doesn't fit into it, don't feel pressure. Personally, I'm looking forward to my reception, because it will give me a chance to interact with my guests and create memories etc. What if you were to compromise and have something really simple and small like cookies and lemonade for guests after the ceremony?

    • Reply
  • Jennifer
    Dedicated April 2011
    Jennifer ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Another alternative may be a small after-wedding gathering with just hor d'oeurves and coffee or tea. My aunt did this after hers. It was short, a little less than an hour, with limited seating. It was a way to thank guests for coming without the giant expense of a full reception. She held hers in the lobby of a fancy office building (after hours of course), but if your church has a gathering hall, that could work perfectly.

    • Reply
  • Hayley C™
    Master March 2008
    Hayley C™ ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I think so... socializing, dancing, cake, music!

    You don't have to do a dinner reception.. you can do a cocktail/appetizer one.... you can do a brunch one (costs less) you can have a late ceremony and just do a dessert reception.... the Party part is also fun. I agree... I was all about the photos too.... I had mine for 3 hrs before the ceremony and took pictures at the house getting ready and then in a park for the "first look" and then couple shots.

    Maybe double think changing the "type" of reception.

    • Reply
  • Melissa
    Savvy September 2011
    Melissa ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Our budget is $10,000 with the place that we found the expense is only about $3000 for 60-70 ppl that we are having! Which is totally do-able. The rest of the money will be on photographer and flowers. My parents are paying for my dress and limo. But I dont know about the reception. Its available for us for 4 hours and those hours fly by.

    Im just so confused about what i wanna do Smiley sad

    its horrible.

    • Reply
  • Hayley C™
    Master March 2008
    Hayley C™ ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Ok.... so $3,000 on the hall, $2,000 on the photographer, $600 on the DJ, $1,000 on flowers... you don't need to go crazy decorating the hall. $200 for invites/stamps. Dress and Limo - free --- That puts you around $7,000.

    You can still cut costs and budget shop to save more for your honeymoon. The brides on here have a lot of money saving tip ideas.

    The dancing and music and socializing is the fun part.... if you take out the sit down dinner part you will have 4 hrs of Fun.... yes it goes by fast... but it makes for a lot of memories.

    Good luck with whatever you pick. happy planning

    • Reply
  • Melissa
    Savvy September 2011
    Melissa ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Youre so right hayley. With no reception i have no wedding video and no memories just some photos. Which i might regret later down the road. My fiancee is going to think im crazy im so indecisive we even put money down on the place already. So if i was canceling just to have the ceremony, that was going to be another hassle.

    • Reply
  • Christine
    Super October 2011
    Christine ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I wouldn't give up the party for anything. It is our time to celebrate our coming out as a married couple. I think the appetizaer idea is a good one. No one says you have to provide a ton of alcohol or spend 5 hours partying. The wedding itself will not last long at all. Enjoy your day!

    • Reply
  • MB's Mom
    Super June 2011
    MB's Mom ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I would have the reception. Yes, the people that come will enjoy the 'party'. But they also came to celebrate with you/new hubby. $3000 is reasonable for that size. (depending where you live). I have to say the my reception was the most fun party I've ever been to.... even 27 years later. Don't miss out.

    • Reply
  • MrsD2011
    Master October 2011
    MrsD2011 ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Personally, I wouldn't give up the reception ... I'm also looking forward to my reception and mingling with my family members and FS friends and having fun. I want a chance to create memories and kick back and relax.

    I would at least do a simple coffee/cake/horsdeuvres reception for maybe 1-2 hours. You can buy the cake at the grocery store. And you or a family member or friend can make a simple two tiered cake so you guys have the cake cutting.

    But it is your wedding, so whatever makes you happy. Go for it.

    • Reply
  • Melissa
    Savvy September 2011
    Melissa ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Yes im in new york city so its a pretty good price. Usually places here go for about $110 per person and you have to have a minimum of 100 guests.

    • Reply
  • Hotrod
    Expert June 2014
    Hotrod ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I was contemplating having only a ceremony as well.. to me, all that matters is being married through the church since that is the actual "marriage", the "wedding" part is just a party for others to go celebrate with you. In the end, we decided on doing the reception, but do whatever YOU want, don't please any one else other than you and your fiance on your wedding day.

    • Reply
  • Elizabeth
    Master October 2012
    Elizabeth ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I think you will regret not having a reception. I know I want one so I can socialize and talk to my guests. You can have a wonderful wedding for $10,000 or less. The reception is to celebrate your marriage. It's can be simple and elegant.

    • Reply
  • binx
    Master August 2010
    binx ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    You can do whatever you want however i think you'll regret having the party, celebrating your union with family & friends... dancing the night away. you're mom is right, a lot of people don't go to the church, just party (free-loaders, lol). you can always do lots of apps or a breakfast prior to the ceremony. just because most of us brides want/loved our reception... do what you & FS want.

    • Reply
  • rlg510
    Super July 2011
    rlg510 ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I would suggest a minimal cake and punch reception. It would be short and sweet and inexpensive. A few years ago, that's all anybody had - sit down dinners were not heard of except for the very wealthy.

    At a small informal reception, you can thank your guests for coming and that's it. Church social halls work great for this type of reception.

    Or, if you really don't want a reception, I would limit guests to immediate family and closest friends only. Holding the ceremony in a home would also help keep it small and short and sweet and the extended list of guests would understand why they were not invited because a home generally will not have room to fit everyone.

    Frankly, when I was first planning my wedding I wanted to have it at my MOH's home with only about 35 guests, but as I went through my "must be there" list, it grew beyond 35 pretty quickly.

    • Reply
  • Meghan
    Master August 2011
    Meghan ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I personally think you would regret it. Everyone will expect some sort of reception. They don't want to get dressed up, drive to the church, watch a 15-20 minute wedding, then go home.

    You should do some sort of reception. It doesn't need to be big. Cake and punch in the church's reception room. A small gathering at your home, or one of your parent's home with finger foods, a cake and guests who are the closest to you.

    You can do something small and simple and not spend alot of money.

    • Reply
  • Lise Ramos
    Lise Ramos ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Yes, you would be missing out, but here are some questions, suggestions:

    1. All the people that are important will be there to celebrate with you. Don't worry about who won't come.

    2. That being said, does the church itself have a backyard or a large meeting room? If so, why don't you do a "coffee/tea" and soft drink bar and have a big, beautiful cake. This would be very little money as compared to a whole reception. Or,

    3. Have your wedding as usual. Get some cards made up with a little favor (anything wedding related from a discount store would do or you can offer each guest a carnations (about 50 cents apiece). The card can say something like: "Thank you for your love and support on our wedding day. We will hold a reception in 2012 and dance the night away with you." Love, (your name and your groom's name).

    This way your folks won't feel "jipped" and you can save for next year and enjoy your honeymooon without guilt. Good luck!

    • Reply
  • Tiffany
    Just Said Yes December 2012
    Tiffany ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Since my finace and I dont have much money we are also opting on the reception. I feel horrible, but the idea of a small snack afterward is a great suggestion Smiley smile

    • Reply
  • M
    Just Said Yes October 2014
    Meghan ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I think yes. My fiancé and I will be doing the same BUT we will be having a lunch style thing afterward. Our ceremony is going to be at a garden and afterward at the same place we will be having catering platters from Our local grocery store of sandwiches, salad, and desserts as well as drinks (lemonade and water served in glass pitchers) and our wedding cake. We are doing it this way to keep things simple and sweet to save money and for less stress. We will then also be able to spend the money we want on our attire and have the ceremony at a beautiful place. Smiley smile

    • Reply
  • C
    Just Said Yes October 2019
    Carmela ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    For me the important part is the church ceremony! And I find it truly rude of guest to only show up at the reception! I plan to invite everyone to church and Only those who show up will then get the invite to the reception!!!

    • Reply
  • A
    Just Said Yes April 2016
    Alejandra ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I'm having a ceremony only with just some snacks and drinks for my 50 guest right after, just to have some time to take some pictures and all that. Afterwards I am having a dinner with only 20 of those guest which are my immediate family at a very nice restaurant. That way I can have something without the big expense of a reception, and at the same time being thoughtful with all my guest at the ceremony by providing some appies.

    • Reply

You voted for . Add a comment 👇

×


WeddingWire celebrates love ...and so does everyone on our site! Learn more

Rockstars

  • D
    Getting married in 07/03/2025

Groups

WeddingWire article topics