What do y’all think of...

My FH is a doctor and will eventually, after years and years of training, make a substantial income. If I had met him after he was established in his career, owned his own home, and had specific retirement accounts set up then I would definitely sign one and would not be offended. With that being said, I met him before medical school and we are 100% in this together and so there is no reason for a prenup because neither of us has assets worth protecting and anything we will have we will have built together.

We've been together 10 years and we will have a prenup. We both want to leave (IF that ever happens) with what we came with. FH entered the relationship with a house he inherited with no mortgage and we both stand to inherit large-ish sums of money and property from our grandparents. I don't personally care but he wants the prenup and I think it's fine.

I think they are necessary in situations of large assets. My family has a large hunting ranch in Colorado that is divided up among multiple family members, so it's a requirement for blood family members to have a prenup in place if they are owners.

I would never get married without one. I bring a lot more to the marriage financially than my fiance, but I would even if I did not. I would never put myself or my future children in a situation where I could lose what I have. Its is more about protection than anything else. Plus, I wouldn't want to marry someone who refused to sign one. That is MUCH more shady to me. If you have nothing to hide you shouldn't have an issue with signing one.