Skip to main content

Post content has been hidden

To unblock this content, please click here

April
Super November 2018

Reception only guests

April, on August 6, 2018 at 12:56 PM

Posted in Etiquette and Advice 32

We are having an intimate wedding, total of 26 guests (this is the MAX based on the ceremony location). Our reception location is also small but allowed us to invite a total of 33 guests (this is the max based on restaurant capacity). So a total of 7 more guests. So we have a few people that we sent...

We are having an intimate wedding, total of 26 guests (this is the MAX based on the ceremony location). Our reception location is also small but allowed us to invite a total of 33 guests (this is the max based on restaurant capacity). So a total of 7 more guests. So we have a few people that we sent "reception only" invites to. The wording that we used, probably could have been better. It is my mistake, I didn't do more research on appropriate wording beforehand and now it is too late. I have to work with what I have. The invite for these "reception only" folks stated:
"Please join us for a celebration dinner"
I guess looking back, this wording doesn't clearly articulate that we will already be married by the time we meet at dinner. So now that is done, I am trying to determine the best way to handle things.


1 - Should I contact these people directly to make sure that they know / understand that this will be a post wedding celebration we are inviting them to since we sadly couldn't invite them to the ceremony?
2 - Should I put wording on the wedding website that indicates it will be a limited / small / intimate ceremony with a larger dinner celebration after? This way any "reception only" guests that check out the website will see this and understand?

Any advice (kind advice) would be greatly appreciated. I realize that I should have done more detailed research beforehand so I want to make sure that I handle this well and kindly to all our guests.

32 Comments

  • Tara
    Master September 2018
    Tara ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment
    I dont remember reading that the 26 were NOT only family. Ive been on the b-list at a wedding and it didnt bother me a bit especially now planning my own and seeing how difficult and expensive it is. Im an adult, im not going to cry that i didnt make the cut if im offended i just wont go
    • Reply
  • LB
    Champion November 2016
    LB ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment

    100% number 2. It's not rude to have open seats. Plus the restaurant wouldn't set a place for guests who weren't coming.

    • Reply
  • Sarah
    Master June 2016
    Sarah ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment
    2 is more rude. There’s nothing rude about not maxing out the reception space.
    • Reply
  • April
    Super November 2018
    April ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment

    And to be clear - everyone invited is family. Whether by blood or because we have spent our entire lives together - they are all family.

    • Reply
  • LB
    Champion November 2016
    LB ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment

    That's fine you weren't offended by being b-listed but that doesn't make it not rude. Just like her guests who aren't invited to the reception only might not be offended, but again, doesn't make it not rude.

    Also, there is a difference between family and immediate family which is what the poster you responded to was talking about...

    • Reply
  • starsinwaves
    VIP November 2018
    starsinwaves ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I'd reach out to those seven people ahead of time and explain the situation. It's the best you can do at this point. As PPs have said, you don't want people to show up to find out they were part of the 20% of guests who weren't invited to the ceremony.

    • Reply
  • April
    Super November 2018
    April ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment

    Thank you, we will do that.

    • Reply
  • Melinda
    Super August 2018
    Melinda ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment
    Sorry to say OP, but #2 for sure. I don’t see how anyone would think #1 is rude.

    But.... there’s no going back now. If I received the invite with the wording you outlined, it would be clear to me that the ceremony had already taken place. I think if I showed up to the dinner and saw that it was still an initimate dinner and not a full blown reception, I’d be a little confused and may assume you chose to elope with no attendees at all. You know these guests the best as to whether or not they will take offense to the fact that they were one of seven who were not invited to the ceremony.
    • Reply
  • Caytlyn
    Legend November 2019
    Caytlyn ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment
    Having open seats isn’t rude at all. That affects no one but you. Just removing those seats, or even an entire table, would solve that “issue” rather easily.
    • Reply
  • Malwen107
    VIP October 2018
    Malwen107 ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    If this had been my situation, I probably would have nixed those 7 guests, or found a venue that could accommodate my full guest list (the point of the reception is celebrating that 2 people got married, which they were not there for). Since this is the situation, I would reach out to those 7 people individually, by phone, and explain the situation and ask if they will join you. I don't think there is any point in drawing attention to a hand full of people on the website, or in another public way

    • Reply
  • Kay
    Super November 2018
    Kay ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I don't really get the mistake...I would completely understand what you mean? However, I would assume you had a city hall wedding and only a small amount of people went and I wasn't in fact part of the minority that didn't. Not sure that matters but just to add on perspective?

    • Reply
  • Tia
    Just Said Yes May 2022
    Tia ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    I know this is super old but I felt the need to comment I'm on your side April, idk what the outcome was but there's only so much you can do with the venue restrictions and it's YOUR DAY and nobody else's. I think as long as you're super clear that whoever is being invited to reception only on the invites is only being invited to the reception you can do whatever you want. If someone wants to be offended that's on them and in the end they do not have to come. It's the thought that counts and the fact you're still trying to include them! I wouldn't feel comfortable inviting people to watch me get married out of obligation and if I was invited to a reception only I wouldn't be offended at all, I would be happy the couple thought enough of me to include me in the celebration in some way.


    And I've heard people say it looks gift grabby which couldn't be further from the truth. Gifts are not (and never are) expected and if someone is going to withhold a gift(that should be given freely) over the simple fact they didn't witness someone getting married is so petty to me. The couple already is paying for a whole celebration that you are invited to attend and that is enough. What the guest decides to do based upon that is solely up to them but deciding to withhold out of pettiness for not being invited to the ceremony like I said before is sad. And nobody is forcing them to attend either.
    Now inviting someone to ONLY the ceremony is another story, I won't go there. But anyway I just felt compelled to say do whatever works for you and this goes for everyone! Don't judge, especially because it's not your wedding and at the end of the day it's all about the fact you and your partner are married. ❤️
    • Reply

You voted for . Add a comment 👇

×
WeddingWire celebrates love ...and so does everyone on our site! Learn more

Groups

WeddingWire article topics