So, I went to see our videographer over the weekend, and had a good time. The only thing we could not decide on was the length of video. As photographers have stated, no one is interested in the wedding video anymore, photographs and highlight videos tell the story much better, and very few people would sit down and watch a video in the length of an hour so.
My response was- yes I have spent so much time on all the details and loadsa things will be on the video that I wouldn’t have noticed, and no-one will probably watch the video as much as me either, and the highlight video is a sneak peek for those who cant ve bothered to watch. The videographer said also that it would be better if we had a shorter wedding video of 30-40 minutes because it allows for a higher quality production to be made, as you don’t fill the time with still shots etc…..
Is it me but-if it’s the same price I would feel like an hour video regardless, rather than 30minutes. I would feel gutted condensing our day into 30 minutes of footage-high quality or not. Do I need a reality check…am I being a bridezilla?