Hi all
Bit of a rant so brace for impact.
My BF's future in-laws live on the other side of the world (think 18+ hours of travel time). She's getting married, and wants to have a destination wedding, stating that since her in-laws would have to travel to us, it's going to be 'fair' on everyone by having it halfway across the world so it is somewhat equal distance between us and them (tbh I struggle to see how this is fair considering that it's more expensive for them to get there than to just fly to where we all live, and now everyone else has to fork out money to attend the wedding too, but alas this is what she wants).
The issue is, I will not be attending and she is not very happy with that. I save up every year to have a holiday with my husband (usually by cruise with the family), however I cannot justify the expense of her wedding. The wedding will cost us more than $1,500 per person in airfare alone + accommodation + time off work etc.
To top it off, my husband is petrified of flying, and despite having travelled a fair bit myself, in the last year my anxiety has led to a fear of flying which has me grounded just the same. I would like to get over my fear of flying (and hope my husband can too) as there is much of the world to see, but given how I went from 1-100 ok with flying to fearful, I do not know how quickly this will happen.
Nonetheless, as I have travelled before, and do take a holiday annually anyway (by boat), my friend does not understand why I can't just go to therapy and fork out money to attend her wedding. Even if it wasn't for the recent fear of flying, I still don't think I could afford to go to this wedding.
I think all people having destination weddings need to be mindful that it's taxing on people and not the easiest of weddings to attend, but she doesn't seem to understand that I have genuine reasons for which I cannot attend.
How do I get the point across to her without coming off the wrong way?