Skip to main content

Post content has been hidden

To unblock this content, please click here

T
Savvy April 2011

Can I have a band AND a DJ?

Terri, on October 18, 2010 at 10:54 AM Posted in Wedding Reception 0 15

I have always liked the idea of a band. I love live music and I think it will really get our guests in the mood to party. I've also always loved the idea of a DJ. There's nothing like having your fav songs played and getting the party started with crowd pleasers. Is it possible to have the best of both worlds. I am imagining having a band for the cocktail hour and dinner (2 hours) and a DJ for the rest of the reception (2 hours). Will it be too much transition and/or work? Has anyone else ever been to a wedding that did this successfully? Or should I just choose one or the other? Would you like to go to a wedding with both?

15 Comments

Latest activity by Sandy, on October 30, 2018 at 2:52 AM
  • ~Bride 8/28/10~
    Master August 2010
    ~Bride 8/28/10~ ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I think that it is a neat idea! I guess my only concern would be do you have areas where they each can set up or would the DJ have to wait until the band cleared out to set up?

    • Reply
  • L
    Devoted June 2011
    Lauren ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I went to a wedding with both - The band leader was a friend of the family and they were more of a big-band/swing style. Lots of fun. Then later in the evening the DJ came on. It was a long reception though (New Year's Eve).

    The big factor for most people is cost. Both will probably want to charge you full stick even if they're only playing part of the time. Makes it cost-prohibitive for most people.

    • Reply
  • Rosie
    Master June 2011
    Rosie ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Lauren is right...the band (and probably the DJ, too) will probably require you to pay for the full reception even though they're only playing for half of it, since it's taking up a night that they might've otherwise been able to play a full reception. Some bands and DJs also have exclusivity clauses in their contracts, meaning that they won't share the night with any other entertainers. Most bands bring some DJ'ing equipment with them, specifically so that they can play music during their breaks. You could always just be very specific with the band and pick out songs that you want them to play recordings of, rather than singing/playing on instruments themselves.

    • Reply
  • T
    Savvy April 2011
    Terri ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I am a Mrs: really good point. For it to work we would have to have the cocktail hour and dinner in the same room which was not the original plan. I definitely don't want there to be a lull because of transition.

    Rosie & Lauren C: I was a little worried about cost too. Bands seem to be a bit more expensive than DJs but I was thinking that we could find a small band for a reasonable amount....I have to do more research.

    Someone mentioned that there are bands who bring DJs with them and they go back and fourth. I might look into that option too. My only fear is that people will really start to "feel" one or the other and then they'll be disappointed when their least favorite of the two starts up.

    • Reply
  • >>>Insert Ty's New Gangsta Name Here<<<
    Master March 2012
    >>>Insert Ty's New Gangsta Name Here<<< ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    "My only fear is that people will really start to "feel" one or the other and then they'll be disappointed when their least favorite of the two starts up."

    Terri you can't please everyone. Do what works for YOU.

    • Reply
  • Meghan
    Master August 2011
    Meghan ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I wouldn't have the band play during dinner. A string quartet type thing yes- but a get the crowd going band- no.

    I'm coming back to cost. Say you have the ban dplay for a few hours, then switch to a DJ. The placement of the DJ shouldn't be too big an issue- so that's not a concern. But the band members would have to kill a couple of hours before they start tearing down their equipment- or they'll be tearing downand loading up during the reception.

    You reception also seems short. 1 hour for cocktails, 1 hour for dinner and only 2 hours for the rest? The traditional stuff (Cake cutting, dances, garter/bouquet tosses, speeches) take up a good 45 minutes to an hour. Than only leave about 1 hour to really party.

    • Reply
  • L
    Devoted June 2011
    Lauren ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    My concern is that a band that is pretty cheap may not be very good. In my experience, a really good band is better than a good DJ. But it depends on what kind of music you want. I would rather pay extra for either a really good band or good DJ than have either be mediocre. If music is really important to you, do your research (check bands and DJs out in person) and get someone fabulous.

    • Reply
  • Miss Michal
    VIP February 2012
    Miss Michal ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    If you're partying into the night, I would invite the band to play a few sets for the "first shift" (grandma and the folks who will go home early), and then have the DJ take over for those who want to keep going. That said, I'm having trouble seeing how hiring both will add to the event--I would go for one or the other.

    • Reply
  • T
    Savvy April 2011
    Terri ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    TeeDub....THANK YOU for that reminder! I continue to forget that no matter what I do everyone won't be happy. I am going to kill myself trying. I just want people to walk away having had a good time.

    Meghan: I don't think our reception is too short especially since it's on a Sunday. 4 hours is typical in my region, even for Saturday weddings. Anywho, I think you brought up a good point that a band won't really be needed until the last 2 hours. I think my modified plan is to find a band and DJ that work together. If I can't find that I'm not sure what I'll do. It's hard for me to decide between a DJ and a band, but I am willing to bet my fiance will say DJ.

    • Reply
  • beachbum2004
    Super June 2015
    beachbum2004 ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Yes I see nothing wrong with it. It is your wedding.

    • Reply
  • Rosie
    Master June 2011
    Rosie ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Good luck on your search! Always keep in mind that a good DJ is better than a bad band, and especially with bands, you get what you pay for! Don't be afraid to ask if you can stop in an event they're playing at to listen to them. If the lead singer has a bad voice, it won't matter how good a deal you got! Not sure what area you're in or what your budget is, but as a reference, I'm in central NJ (45 minutes from NYC and 45 minutes from Philly) and the average wedding band is $****...that's substantially more than DJs, which range from $600-2500 around here. The band we ended up booking is amazing. They usually charge $6500 but FH is friends with the trumpet player so they're playing for half off as a gift to him...phew!

    • Reply
  • Carlos Molina
    Carlos Molina ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    We've done the shared entertainment (band/DJ) on several occasions. Here are some things to consider:

    1) Do you really want 2 PA's (sound equipment) to dominate your pictures? It's usually bad enough that you have the DJ's or the band's equipment in the background, but the two of them are probably too much.

    2) A band inherently provides more entertainment than a DJ. Having the band play first and then the DJ could create an emotional roller-coaster for your guests.

    3) A great way to do it is to have a "jazz" type band doing cocktails and dinner, following up with dancing once the DJ takes over.

    Good luck!

    • Reply
  • daniel welsh
    daniel welsh ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Remember, there are no silly questions, nor are there any silly ways to have your night exactly the way you want it. I have been performing wedding receptions for 29 years, and have been a part of and created most every scenario you can imagine. Anything is possible and CAN be done, it is all a matter of preference and what is within your budget. Whether it's your DJ performing everything front to back, or having a harpist play your bridal march and recessional, strings, keyboardists, the list is endless as your imagination will allow you to be. You can have a "wish list" of what your dream wedding day is. Then look at your budget, and decide what is the most important things to you on your list. I have emceed many weddings, and played between sets for bands for years with no problems. True professionals can make it seamless. I hope you did it YOUR way!

    • Reply
  • Kenneth Richardson
    Kenneth Richardson ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Yes You Can!!

    Check out our Band/DJ Combo

    www.tritoneinc.com

    • Reply
  • S
    Just Said Yes February 2019
    Sandy ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    We had an amazing band at our wedding earlier this year where the band leader was very accommodating in putting together a DJ pre-recorded mix to play through their system towards the last hour of the night.

    This saved the extra cost of hiring a DJ and we still had the luxury of a live band which is absolutely superior to having a DJ. After attending many other weddings, we realized that a DJ is really great for 21st & 30th birthday parties but it lacks the live interaction with the guests, which only a live band can do.

    We attended several showcases before choosing a band called Paris by Night in Melbourne, who also included a free professional MC service if we booked online.

    We highly recommend using this great wedding band in Melbourne!

    • Reply

You voted for . Add a comment 👇

×

Related articles

WeddingWire celebrates love ...and so does everyone on our site! Learn more

Groups

WeddingWire article topics