Skip to main content
ARE YOU A VENDOR?

Post content has been hidden

To unblock this content, please click here

Kimberly
VIP October 2014

To put "adult only reception" or not?

Kimberly, on June 4, 2014 at 7:28 AM

Posted in Planning 22

So we've decided due to limited space we won't be inviting kids to the wedding. I just can't decide if I should actually say "adult only reception to follow" or if I should leave it as "reception to follow" and hope leaving kids names' off the invites is enough. What are you guys doing?

So we've decided due to limited space we won't be inviting kids to the wedding. I just can't decide if I should actually say "adult only reception to follow" or if I should leave it as "reception to follow" and hope leaving kids names' off the invites is enough. What are you guys doing?

Show all

22 Comments

  • LadyMonk
    Master September 2014
    LadyMonk ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    We simply put the names of the invited people on the invitation. I personally do not agree with "adult only" wording, but then again, I don't again I don't agree with writing the number of seats reserved, either, but it seems like most people on WW do it. I've never been invited to a wedding with any of this, though so maybe it's a regional acceptance thing.

    • Reply
  • P
    Dedicated November 2014
    Private User ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I think not including kids is rude anyway but it would definitely offend me if it was on the invitation. If I had a kid and their name wasn't on the invitation I would already assume they weren't invited. I wouldn't need to be reminded that my kid wasn't welcome.

    • Reply

You voted for . Add a comment 👇

×
WeddingWire celebrates love ...and so does everyone on our site! Explore how we embrace diversity

Groups

Show more

WeddingWire article topics