Skip to main content

Post content has been hidden

To unblock this content, please click here

H
Dedicated December 2020

Stuck Between Two Ideas

Halie, on June 24, 2020 at 12:04 AM Posted in Wedding Reception 0 11

Hey there!

After a lot of thinking, I am stuck between two ideas for our wedding. Here is a little context: we are keeping things small with only 35 guests if everyone shows. It is immediate family and our closest friends. We will be traveling to the Texas Hill Country to get married and everyone is super excited about this. It is super special to us and also hosted a ton of vacations for our families. Ok, so...

First Idea

Ceremony at Chapel Dulcinea with cake and toast reception. Then invite whichever family wants to join for late lunch/dinner locally or in Austin. This is the most budget friendly because we wouldn't be paying for a reception space and we wouldn't pay for our family's food. Also, we would pay for a photographer for a shorter amount of time since the cake cutting and toasting would already be done at the chapel. If we did this we would make it clear on the invitation that it is cake and punch reception.

Second Idea

Ceremony at Vista West Ranch and dinner at 12 Fox Brewery. This is more money, but still in our price range. I feel like it would add a bigger price tag because of food, centerpieces, and a alcohol minimum at the brewery. However, we would have more time with our family/friends since we would be for sure all eating together.

I love both venues. I guess the question is... do we feed our guests or invite everyone out for an informal meal? My brother already said to spend money on a honeymoon rather than a wedding so it got me thinking... do I save the extra money?

11 Comments

Latest activity by Elizabeth, on June 28, 2020 at 12:26 PM
  • M
    Legend June 2019
    Melle ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    Is the price difference between both that significant? If so then the first one sounds fine actually
    • Reply
  • H
    Dedicated December 2020
    Halie ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment

    It's $500 verses $2500

    • Reply
  • Pirate & 60s Bride
    Legend March 2017
    Pirate & 60s Bride ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    #2 all the way. With such intimate guest list of mostly family, treat them to food & drinks and let them get to spend some time with you both and each other.
    • Reply
  • Nefetera
    VIP March 2015
    Nefetera ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    I would go with the option num 2. Only bc it's much more intiment time and time with family and friends. However one optional is diff from the other. At the end of the day it depends whichever choice you guys would perfer
    • Reply
  • M
    Master October 2021
    Mrs.a ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Definitely option 2

    • Reply
  • Jai
    VIP May 2020
    Jai ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    Option #2 def sounds nicer. And as a guest to a wedding I wouldn't want to pay for my food like in option 1
    • Reply
  • K
    Devoted August 2020
    Kate ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    I think both options sound really lovely, but I would feed your guests either way. I think if you are inviting them to join you for a meal, they shouldn’t have to pay for it themselves. That’s just my opinion. If that is a non-negotiable for Option 1, then I would recommend going with Option 2.
    • Reply
  • A
    Super August 2020
    Alex ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Option 2 will be way more fun! We are doing something similar for on Plan C weddings.

    • Reply
  • J
    Master October 2022
    Jana ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment
    Agreed. If you can't afford to feed guests then don't invite them. A full meal isn't required since you can serve cake and coffee at a non meal time, but don't ask them to pay for their own meals.
    • Reply
  • Molly
    VIP September 2020
    Molly ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I would go with option 2. Your wedding day goes by so fast. The more time you can spend with everyone the better. You will likely never have all of those people together again.

    • Reply
  • Elizabeth
    Super June 2021
    Elizabeth ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Option 2 sounds "nicer" in a traditional sense, but the benefits of a nice honeymoon are substantial. For us, a honeymoon was more important than some of the more luxurious options we considered splurging on. People generally thing the fancier option is always better for weddings, but really both options are good - it's a matter of what you want. As long as you do host a reception with some food, I think option 1 is fine and you can splurge on the honeymoon.

    • Reply

You voted for . Add a comment 👇

×
WeddingWire celebrates love ...and so does everyone on our site! Explore how we embrace diversity

Groups

WeddingWire article topics