Fh and I have been reevaluating our budget and found that we saved more than expected and now have some extra money. Most of that is now going towards a honeymoon we didn't expect to get (!!!) but there's a little left that I would like to put into photography.
Currently, we have a single photographer for only six hours. I was never super happy with that but knew I could make it work. But now I don't have to! So I talked to the photographer and we basically have two options:
1. Add an additional 2 hours of coverage for $500
2. Add a second shooter for the 6 hours we have for $750
I think that both of these options would be great. I think they'd help us get more awesome photos as well as relieve some of the pressure I'd expected to feel, rushing around to get all the pics I want
I'm not sure which to go with... My mom wants option 1, but I'm leaning towards 2. FH had no opinion of course. Which would y'all pick?
Post content has been hidden
To unblock this content, please click here