Fh and I have been reevaluating our budget and found that we saved more than expected and now have some extra money. Most of that is now going towards a honeymoon we didn't expect to get (!!!) but there's a little left that I would like to put into photography.
Currently, we have a single photographer for only six hours. I was never super happy with that but knew I could make it work. But now I don't have to! So I talked to the photographer and we basically have two options:
1. Add an additional 2 hours of coverage for $500
2. Add a second shooter for the 6 hours we have for $750
I think that both of these options would be great. I think they'd help us get more awesome photos as well as relieve some of the pressure I'd expected to feel, rushing around to get all the pics I want
I'm not sure which to go with... My mom wants option 1, but I'm leaning towards 2. FH had no opinion of course. Which would y'all pick?