Skip to main content

Post content has been hidden

To unblock this content, please click here

F
Just Said Yes August 2014

Need Help: Is a 3 hour reception too short?

Felicia, on January 23, 2014 at 9:02 AM Posted in Planning 1 24

My wedding is planned for a Sunday and I'm starting to get concerned that the timeline we have scheduled is too short. We are only inviting 50 people that will be family and close friends. Most of our close friends will be in the bridal/groom parties. The basic venue package offers 30 min for the ceremony and 3 hours for the reception which gives a total of 3.5 hours for the entire wedding. I am starting to get concerned because we need time after the ceremony to take pictures as well so that only gives us about 2 - 2.5 hrs to spend with guests. We are not having an open bar though. Just champagne and a signature drink. I'm wondering if I should add 30 min or a hour to the total timeline. Right now the wedding starts at 5pm and ends at 8:30pm. Any advice you have is greatly appreciated!

24 Comments

Latest activity by Private User, on January 23, 2014 at 11:54 AM
  • TheOGJesse's Girl
    Master March 2014
    TheOGJesse's Girl ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    My reception is 3 hours, so I hope it's not too short, lol. I think any more than that would be tedious.

    • Reply
  • Happily Engaged
    Super September 2014
    Happily Engaged ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Our reception is 3 hours. cocktail hr then 3 hrs for.dinner and dancing. I think that's plenty time

    • Reply
  • AndreaLily
    Master October 2013
    AndreaLily ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I think 3 hours is too short, however your wedding is on a Sunday evening so that makes it more acceptable. Just remember that it takes time for people to eat, you want to mingle with everyone, take pictures with guests, speeches etc. Also if you're doing a cake cutting, bouquet/garter toss you need to factor those in. Our reception was 5.5 hours long and it still seemed so short when it was all over. I would definitely add more time if your budget allows it. You definitely shouldn't feel pressed for time on your wedding day.

    • Reply
  • erin
    VIP April 2014
    erin ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I think that's a reasonable time frame. Are you set on an evening wedding? If you pushed it earlier in the day to an afternoon wedding or lunch wedding then you would have tons of time to take pictures after the ceremony. You could always take them after if you have it in the evening, but you might just want to be done at that point and your wedding party might not want to be out too late if they are working the next day. If you aren't bothered about seeing each other before the ceremony, you could always do a bunch of pictures then so that would limit the photo time after the ceremony.

    • Reply
  • Janaynj
    Expert June 2015
    Janaynj ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I also think that's maybe a wee bit short. IDK if you're doing parent dances, garter toss, cake cutting, etc, but those things may be rushed in an attempt to fit everything into that time frame. There should be no rushing on your wedding day!

    • Reply
  • ChampagneTaste
    VIP September 2014
    ChampagneTaste ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    For a Sunday Wedding.., I mean I would add one hour depending on if its a sit down meal?

    • Reply
  • ChampagneTaste
    VIP September 2014
    ChampagneTaste ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Dude my reception is 8 hours long hahaha

    With cocktail hour... Last call at 1am

    • Reply
  • winnipegwriter
    Master September 2015
    winnipegwriter ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Mine is the same as @ChampagneTaste -- eight hours and lasting until 1 a.m. So I would think that 3 hours is too short. But if it's on a Sunday, I think you can get away with it.

    • Reply
  • .
    Master October 2013
    .... ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    We rented the venue for 5 hours total (including ceremony) - 30 minutes for ceremony, one hour cocktail hour, so it was 3.5 for the reception itself (intros, first dance, buffet dinner, parent dances, dancing, cake cutting, bouquet/garter toss. I would add an hour and maybe start the ceremony at 4 instead (since it's a Sunday wedding - though 9:30 wouldn't be too awfully late either), if it is in your budget and invitations havent gone out yet.

    • Reply
  • FutureMrsP
    Master October 2014
    FutureMrsP ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Our entire timeline is 6.5 hours - 30 minutes for the ceremony, 1 hour for the cocktail hour/pictures etc - then 5 hours for dinner/drinking and dancing.

    • Reply
  • Mrs. Shanon V
    Master May 2014
    Mrs. Shanon V ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    We have our venue space from 4-11. (Including getting ready space but you have to be cleaned up and OUT by 11). Our ceremony starts at 6, we anticipate a 30 minute ceremony, we'll knock out the ceremony portraits in about 30 (we're not much for posed pics anyways) and launch into the reception. Guests will be eating while we dance.

    • Reply
  • kelsey
    Super July 2014
    kelsey ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    For me personally that would be way too short! But that is just because I love dancing- I could probably dance for about 6 hours LOL.. but really at least 2-3 hours for dancing for me! Is there anyway you could do photos beforehand so that you don't have to waste time during the short time you have to do photos? Also- you will have to stay super strict to the time line so I would advise getting a day of coordinator to help you stay on task!

    • Reply
  • We'llAlwaysHaveParis
    Master November 2013
    We'llAlwaysHaveParis ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Ours was 7 hours, from 3-10, and that felt just about right to me.

    • Reply
  • Miss_Tee
    Dedicated March 2014
    Miss_Tee ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I don't think so. Our ceremony and reception is a total of 4 hours only. 30 minutes for ceremony. 30 minutes for cocktail hour(minutes), and 3 hours for reception. We are having ours on a Saturday from 12p to 4p.

    • Reply
  • FutureMrsHagan
    Expert May 2014
    FutureMrsHagan ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Ours is from 5:30 to 12. I personally think 3 hours is too short but it is on a sunday so I'm sure people won't want to stay out too late anyway.

    • Reply
  • michele
    VIP October 2014
    michele ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    On a Sunday with small amount of people, 3 hours is ok.

    • Reply
  • ChampagneTaste
    VIP September 2014
    ChampagneTaste ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Rock on ^

    But yeah seriously is it a Canadian thing to party until the wee hours of the night? Because I thought 1 am was too early for last call and my family and I discussed it to great lengths and we just decided it was gonna be a compromise for the venue I wanted.

    • Reply
  • Julie
    Expert September 2014
    Julie ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Too short... ours is 3:00-9:00 including cocktail hour, and we're going to have

    an after party because we definitely won't be done celebrating.

    However, since you only have 50 people, it doesn't need as long a time frame

    as bigger weddings, since you will easily have time to socialize with everyone.

    Also, if it's not a big dance crowd then a couple hours of mingling could work.

    • Reply
  • S
    VIP October 2014
    SoontobeMrsGlover ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Mines is 3 hours

    • Reply
  • THE Mrs. Russell
    VIP June 2014
    THE Mrs. Russell ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Being that it's a Sunday wedding, it should be fine - ours is on a Friday and the reception is 4 hours plus a cocktail hour for appetizers, drinks, and mingling while we are taking pics.

    • Reply

You voted for . Add a comment 👇

×


WeddingWire celebrates love ...and so does everyone on our site! Learn more

Rockstars

  • D
    Getting married in 07/03/2025

Groups

WeddingWire article topics