Skip to main content

Post content has been hidden

To unblock this content, please click here

MrsVoegs17
VIP September 2017

Head table

MrsVoegs17, on May 26, 2017 at 1:43 PM

Posted in Style and Décor 38

So I'll start by saying that I have tried and tried to sway FH into doing a sweetheart table vs. head table, but he is not having it. Four members of our bridal party are married (2 couples, no polygamy, lol). So, in order to accommodate the remaining members of our bridal party and their dates, we...

So I'll start by saying that I have tried and tried to sway FH into doing a sweetheart table vs. head table, but he is not having it. Four members of our bridal party are married (2 couples, no polygamy, lol). So, in order to accommodate the remaining members of our bridal party and their dates, we would need a head table that seats 16 people, or 17 if my daughter sits at the table with us. Our venue charges $30 per platform section which seats two, so for 16-17 we are looking at an extra $240, which in my opinion is ridiculous. I tried to use this extra cost to further sway FH, but his reply was "we don't need platforms".

Two questions:

1. Would our head table would look okay without the platform? I have included a picture of the head table set up with the platform. My concern here is that guests in the back of the room may not be able to see us well.

38 Comments

  • MrsVoegs17
    VIP September 2017
    MrsVoegs17 ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    @Grace, I like that idea. I will run it past FH.

    • Reply
  • MrsA2B
    Expert September 2017
    MrsA2B ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    It seems to be very, very unpopular on here whenever people mention a head table or separating guests. However, in weddings I've actually been to, my FH has been a groomsman in many and I would feel very odd up at the head table, not being in the wedding, especially bc they typically have bridal party things to do, speeches, pics to take, so I'd rather be on my own (at the bar) for the short time instead of awkwardly being in the way. It's seriously not a big deal in our group

    • Reply
  • LC
    Expert June 2017
    LC ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    @MrsVoegs, you said "FH also is with the unpopular opinion that we don't need dates up there, and I kind of agree...." So if you know its rude to separate couples, why are you still considering it?

    Honestly, I think you should tell your FH to suck it up and do a sweetheart table. If you are concerned about the added seats or logistics of wedding party members bringing their children, I think a sweetheart table is your best bet.

    • Reply
  • Anne
    Master April 2017
    Anne ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Yeah it's not a big deal in our group either. People expect the head table to be BP only. I badly wanted to do a king's table, but FH wouldn't budge.... so I decided it wasn't going to be the hill I died on and just got over it.

    ETA: I was actually surprised because he is so introverted that I thought he would understand the reasoning behind it.

    • Reply
  • MrsVoegs17
    VIP September 2017
    MrsVoegs17 ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I know what I said, and agreeing with/thinking something is different than doing. Again, like I said in my original post..looking for ways to accommodate everyone. I understand the so-called wedding "etiquette", FH doesn't always. Does that mean I agree with said etiquette and think it's right or logical? No.

    So, with that being said.. to include everyone's dates and children, looks like my only option is a king's table or "telling FH to suck it up" and have a sweetheart table.

    • Reply
  • LC
    Expert June 2017
    LC ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Sorry MrsVoegs. You seem offended by what I said. I just don't understand how someone could be so against a sweetheart table. You are only sitting there for dinner, and no matter where you sit, the attention is on the bride and groom. Even if you have not been uncomfortable as a guest sitting without your SO, that doesn't mean that everyone feels the same way.

    • Reply
  • WED18
    July 1993
    WED18 ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I would put you and FH and maybe your MOH and BM with their SO's on a platform behind a table floor level with the rest of your WP and SO's. So basically a two tiered head table.

    • Reply
  • WED18
    July 1993
    WED18 ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Something like this


    • Reply
  • MrsVoegs17
    VIP September 2017
    MrsVoegs17 ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Meh, not really offended, just didn't care for the choice of words. My FH has extreme social anxiety issues and having a head table instead of a sweetheart table, for whatever reason, and having a receiving line rather than doing table visits, are the two things he's been adamant and extremely opinionated about. So because of that, so I'm trying to take that into consideration.

    I'm going to continue with my plans to include the date/SO's/children, but I am also going to discuss it with everyone to make sure they are comfortable with it, because I had not considered including their children (duh me). Like @FutureMrsAllen said, the BM's girlfriend may feel uncomfortable sitting at the head table with their one year old. What if she gets fussy or starts crying up there in front of everyone? I know I'd be embarrassed. Same with the wife that will be up there with their two young children. Just something to consider, just as you said, not everyone feels the same way.

    • Reply
  • Kia9
    Super August 2017
    Kia9 ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I don't think the risers are necessary at all. I would save the money for something else.

    • Reply
  • Must Love Cats
    Master October 2017
    Must Love Cats ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I have never been to a wedding nor have I ever been in a wedding where significant others were at the head table. Only the actual wedding party. That's how we're doing it for our head table.

    • Reply
  • FutureMrsKosloske
    Super July 2017
    FutureMrsKosloske ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I have never attended a wedding that did not have a head table with just the bridal party seated at it. I find nothing wrong with a head table.

    • Reply
  • FallforLindahl
    VIP June 2017
    FallforLindahl ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I would do a king's table

    • Reply
  • Courtney
    Super September 2017
    Courtney ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Platform to watch your bridal party do what? Eat? We are def doing a sweetheart table because unless its eating no one will be sitting down anyway.

    • Reply
  • StPaulGal
    Master July 2017
    StPaulGal ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    I'm team "no platform." Why would you even want a platform anyway? What purpose does it serve? What is appealing about literally putting yourself above your guests?

    • Reply
  • ambrok
    Master October 2017
    ambrok ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Kings table instead?

    • Reply
  • ambrok
    Master October 2017
    ambrok ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Our venue offers the risers as well. It's not unheard of but I would like to skip it. FH is set on a head table so we will be doing a typical one for our area (WP only).

    • Reply
  • Robyn
    Super June 2017
    Robyn ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Skip the risers.

    • Reply

You voted for . Add a comment 👇

×
WeddingWire celebrates love ...and so does everyone on our site! Explore how we embrace diversity

Groups

WeddingWire article topics