All Links

I know this is biased coming from a photographer, but here's the thing about Bella.

They're an agency, so they hire the same photographers that you can find on your own, or the ones who can't operate their own studio (this is not to say they're not good photographers-they have a good screening process, I believe). BUT the problem is that you'll end up paying more to hire them through the agency.

Posting photos online is nothing new. We do it, nearly all of our competitors do it. We DON'T send our prints to Walgreens because frankly, Walgreens sucks. We've done last minute prints with them a couple of times, and they 1) cropped awkwardly 2) messed with our color. My opinion is, if you're going to spend the money to get a professional photographer, get your prints done by a professional printer.

So my point is yes, Bella is good if you're looking for an easy way to find a good photographer, and you're OK with paying a bit more for the service. But in my opinion, there's a better way.

I have had a great experience with Bella pictures so far. They have been more than willing to cooperate with everything that I want and need and they offer the BEST package for the best price. AND since I met with them in a certain time frame I got a better package for the less expensive price! They were the only ones that offed me two photographers, owning my photos, and an album. I think that they are worth it.