Honeymoons

IPOD vs. DJ

Hi everyone...we are getting married on New Years Eve and are on a strict budget. The place we are having our reception has a 25K sound system that is brand new. Has anyone ever done their own play list and done their music through a computer or IPOD?

Posted On: Nov 6, 2009 at 4:20 PM | Vendors are allowed to participate

Share | Add to My Watchlist | Flag As Inappropriate |

Shannon p.

Wedding: 12/31/2009

65 Comments | Login or Signup to post a comment!

Jrsgirl1

Wedding: 04/10/2010

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 4:22 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
No, but with the budget Im on, I did think about it. At least I know whats being played. Im just confused as to how to do it. Good Luck. Keep me posted

Nathalie D.

Wedding: 10/09/2011

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 4:24 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
A friend of mine had her ipod playing. It went very well and she had a great mix of music. It sounded great.

FutureMrsH

Wedding: 01/02/2010

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 4:25 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Personally, I think it would make me nervous in case the iPod broke or froze. A DJ has backups and can make it work no matter what, and also can MC the evening which an iPod can't. But I have heard that other people have made it work.

Fernnie

Wedding: 06/12/2010

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 4:28 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I am using my ipod because of my budget. I have playlist labled for what event is going to take place.

happybride1022

Wedding: 05/01/2010

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 4:30 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
This is what we are planning to do. We are creating a play list on itunes and then hooking the laptop into the sound system. We are haveing FH 16 tech-savy nephew run the system and trouble shoot any problems(he's a good kid and we trust him) Also, we have asked one of the groomsman to serve as MC for the evening.

Laura K.

Married: 05/15/2009
Reviews: 7

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 4:34 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
check out this previous thread on this topic, there are a lot of really good points in it. One of the lasts posts has a link to a video which REALLY illustrates the situation well. http://www.weddingwire.com/wedding-forums/is-this-tacky/1cc45f6a16b8ecfe.html

Shannon p.

Wedding: 12/31/2009

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 4:39 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Thank you for all the input! I have a lot to think about!

MEG

Wedding: 06/12/2010

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 4:52 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
http://www.quebbie.com/ You may want to try renting "Quebbie DJ in a Box." It has thousands of different songs in different genres. You can make your own playlists. It has standard wedding MC announcements. I was considering this for my wedding (now my FH uncles band is going to play.) I have not heard of anyone using it so I dont know if it is worth it or not.

Jon M.

Jambalaya Sound and Light

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 5:14 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Depending on the sound system at the venue, you may find a DJ who is willing to bring his coffin case (turntables, mixer, and possibly computer) and plug into their system. That would cut _way_ down on the amount of work the DJ had to do and could save you a bunch of cash. If you don't have a wedding planner, I'd very much recommend having a professional DJ to keep things moving along smoothly. If you do have a wedding planner, ask her what she recommends.

Trina

Wedding: 09/10/2010

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 5:34 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I have never seen it done. But I am hearing that it's very popular. I think it can work. Just make sure you have someone in charge of controling the playlist

Nda_ r.

Wedding: 06/05/2010

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 5:35 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I would recommend using iTunes on a laptop instead as iPods are known to malfunction

Kristina G.

Wedding: 05/30/2010

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 8:29 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I'm using my laptop. Idk if you know this already, but if you set up your wedding website there's a section where you can have ppl request music they'd like to hear at your wedding. I plan on using that, one of my fears w/ using my laptop is that ppl won't like the music, but that way we can get a lot of variety if everyone's giving input.

JulyBride

Married: 07/25/2009
Reviews: 5

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 9:41 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
We used a laptop with iTunes, and I am glad we did because of the money we saved. I had to choose between a photographer or DJ because of our budget, and I HAD to have pictures. Just be really, really careful. I had checked everything out the morning before our wedding day, and eveyrthing was fine. Later that night one out our out of towners that was staying with us asked to borrow it and watched a video using QuickTime. QuickTime is linked with iTunes, and this video had a virus that shut everything down. I didn't find this out until around noon on our wedding day. Luckily my husband knows a lot about stuff like that and was able to fix it, but it was not a stressor we needed just a few hours before our wedding!

MJ Decorations

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 9:57 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Like Laura said, it's not necessarily about the music. It's more about keeping the wedding moving and announcing things as they happen so the photographer or your Mom isn't in the ladies room while you're cutting the cake! I've got no problem with the I-pod for music. I've used a laptop for music at a small party. Just make sure you have someone with some personality and a timeline list for announcements. And, they shouldn't be drinking!

JulyBride

Married: 07/25/2009
Reviews: 5

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 10:00 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
MJ has a great point, I didn't have anyone to announce anything, I did all that myself with the help of our photographer. So def. make sure you have someone to do that for you!

CamoBride

Wedding: 08/07/2010

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 10:06 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I looked into renting the sound equipment as our venue didn't have anything in place. We would have to pick up the equipment, return it, and find someone to man the laptop (or iPod) and it only saved us $150 for both the ceremony and reception - we went with a professional DJ. If your venue has the equipment already, you may ask for a less-experienced DJ and inform them of the equipment already in place - could save you money that way.

Not-A-Bridezilla

Wedding: 05/15/2010

Posted On: Nov 06, 2009 at 10:51 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Honestly... it depends on what you want. If you are not planning on any dances, any announcements, and just want noise in the background then I would go with the ipod. I definitely think that the video is a great example of what can go wrong. Think about it this way--the average reception can be up to 5 hours long (many go over this). You are hiring this person not only to sit and play music but to ENTERTAIN your guests. This doesn't mean you have to have some loud obnoxious DJ but someone who knows how to read a crowd and see what will get them moving-- young and old. An ipod/laptop can't do that and neither can an inexperienced DJ/relative. I know budget is tight but I think there are some things you shouldn't cut out of your wedding and this is one of them.. JMHO

Goodnote

Steve Hoffman - GOOD NOTE DJs

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 2:12 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
It's nice that the place has a $25,000 sound system. I wonder whether the venue will commit to you contractually that someone who knows the sound system and how to operate it and control the volume and trouble-shoot will be on the premises and available to work the sound throughout your reception. (I'm not referring here to who operates your iPod; I'm talking about who's responsible to the rest of the sound system!). Even if the $25,000 sound system works flawlessly that night, isn't your idea like saying "Our reception site has a $100,000 state-of-the-art kitchen, so don't need a caterer -- We'll just have one of our friends bring some raw food, and we'll have another friend cook the food, and we'll have a third friend act as banquet captain, and get some other friends to be the waiters"?????

Goodnote

Steve Hoffman - GOOD NOTE DJs

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 2:15 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Here's another point. Let's assume the site's sound system really is as good as they claim, and let's assume it is operating trouble-free that night. Do you really want to the source of the music coming out of that $25,000 sound system to be mp3's from an iPod??? Do you realize that most mp3's are very compressed -- at 128kps or 192kps, they contain much less "data" than a CD track? So playing an mp3 track through a great sound system is kinda like playing a YouTube video through a high-def TV. Just doesn't make sense to me.

november bride

Married: 11/20/2009

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 5:35 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I'm using either an ipod or my laptop. My wedding is very small and I just really want background music. We are having a luncheon in a private room at a restaurant and then having a catered after party later that evening.

Nicole

Wedding: 06/12/2010

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 9:53 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Hello we are using an ipod to walk down the isle. My sisters friend used her's and it was perfect!!! hope this helps

Jon S.

Wedding: 06/26/2010

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 11:24 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
GoodNote - I know that you're a vendor, so you may be a bit biased, but most people can't discern or care about the minor differences between mp3 (even at 128kps) and CD quality. See: http://www.lincomatic.com/mp3/mp3quality.html Your youtube analogy is also mute. Technology is ever changing - even now youtube has high quality video. The OP is looking to have a good time while trying to keep costs down. Why spend 1 to 5k on a DJ, when that money could be used more effectively (especially if you can't afford it) on something that is an life time investment versus a night of fun? Not everyone can afford a 10k plus wedding or the finest quality of everything. A wedding is about sharing a bond. Not about music, cake, party favors, or decorations.

Tyrone Blue Entertainment

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 12:34 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
You have a good point Jon. I agree with everything you said, but looking at it from a DJ perspective, I'd have to say that it's like saying that since you have a big kitchen at the venue, you should prepare all of the food yourself. Since you have a nice car, you should drive yourself to the front door of the reception. Since you have a point and shoot camera, you should take all of your pictures. The point I'm trying to make is that each bride has different expectations of what she wants in her wedding. Music can make a big difference, and the way it's presented will be noticed by everyone who attends. Have you heard the comments from guests about the iPod music? Trust me, they talk about it later. Your budget dictates what your going to use for music and I understand where you're coming from. You can either hire "Billy Bob's Country Band" or the "Black Eyed Peas". Each has it's pros and cons... how much you can spend is the determining factor. Good luck! Larry

John S.

Married: 09/19/2009

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 1:30 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I'm with you MEG. We rented the Quebbie from our local rental center here in Pittsburgh. It had every song we needed and even Polka's for my grandparents. It does not replace a quality DJ/MC for a big event. Ours was 128 guests and it was perfect. IPods are ok, but with the Quebbie thing or a DJ, you know the songs will be there for almost any need.

DJ Ricky

Bulles Deejays

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 2:07 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Hire a Professional DJ with quality professional equipment. A good DJ will do the following: MC the event Make sure the event moves along in a timely fashion Guarantee all of your pre-requested music Know how to guage a dance floor and provide a good music selection to make sure your guests have a great time Provide a cordless microphone for when toasts and speeches are to be done When guests see an actual human being as the entertainment, and someone who know's what they are doing is in charge of the music then your guests will have a great time. Also, your caterer and photographer's jobs will be made easier when working with a professional DJ. Your photographer will appreciate a DJ being there because they can get WAY better shots of your and your guests having a great time. A IPOD set up is acceptable for a birthday party. A wedding is suppose to be the most rememberable day of your life and an ELEGANT affair. You don't want the hassle of not having a DJ!

reddiva22

Wedding: [Private]

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 2:15 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I don't think that an ipod at a wedding makes it any less of an "elegant" affair. For me its not about the music, the food, the decorations or even the venue, its about sharing with your family and friends the joy of being married and being together for the rest of your lives, just my opinion anyways...

Laura K.

Married: 05/15/2009
Reviews: 7

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 2:26 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
it's fine if you are having a wedding like November Bride said, with no announcements or events and the music is just background noise really. I don't think guests notice where the music is coming from so that would make sense to save money. But the DJ is not about just playing music, they guide your entire event, they are MC (Master of Ceremonies)...that's HUGE! Its not about more money spent or quality of decor etc, it's really creates the atmosphere of it being an event with changing announcements and not just a party. I've seen weddings ruined by a lame DJ, or low budget ones made GREAT by a good DJ. Did you watch that youtube video about it? OMG it was so painful to watch!! So I'm just saying it's fine to skip the DJ but then don't expect the same type of event with announcements, cake cutting, parent dances, etc that you would have had with an MC...if you skip the DJ plan on having a small, non-formal reception/party like PPs have mentioned and it'll be fine

happybride1022

Wedding: 05/01/2010

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 2:51 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I totally agree that there are pros and cons to a ipod reception. As there are pros and cons to a DJ. It's all about how you decide to spend what money you have, and adapting to the decisions you make. Decide what is important to you and your FI and put the money into that. If you fo a laptop/ipod reception, plan ahead. Assign a friend or family member that you TRUST to oversee the equipment. Assign a friend or family member that you TRUST to MC. In regards to getting people on to the dance floor, I think most guests would follow the cue of the bride and groom. If they are out there, cutting up a rug, then they will join you. If you are more reserved and concerned about people getting out there, maybe a DJ is right for you. It all depends on the needs and resources that are unique to each circumstance. Most of all, relax and enjoy the day. Murphy's law says that SOMETHING will go wrong. Plan for the worst and hope for the best.

Shannon p.

Wedding: 12/31/2009

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 3:28 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Our wedding is with 50-60 people. It is our second wedding and we arent doing the dances with the parents only our first dance and the cake cutting. The guy who knows about the sound system will be there to troubleshoot if need be, but wont be an MC. After hearing from everyone....I think we will be fine if we find someone we trust to MC and run the IPOD. Thanks everyone!

RBG

Red Butte Garden

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 4:08 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Shannon, I think you'll be fine. It really is about the type of event you want and your expectations. It sounds like you mainly just need background music and are comfortable knowing there may be some awkward pauses and that somethings might not go as perfectly as planned. I've attended smaller, low-key weddings similar to what it sounds like you are planning, and I think the ipod is fine for that. . My concern for ipod weddings are when the expectations are to have an event that flows flawlessly, to have a high-energy, lots of dancing, lots of fun, kind of like going to a great club, type of experience. An ipod is not going to give you that. If the music/entertainment aspect is a high priority for you and if you would be upset that nobody was dancing at your wedding then you really do need to get a good DJ.

Tyrone Blue Entertainment

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 7:47 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
So many good points here. First and formost is you budget. I base all of my comments on the "normal American average wedding", which has a budget of $25,000. If you're having a $5000 wedding (as I suspect many are leaning toward) then, don't hire a DJ. Your total budget dictates how much you'll be spending on all of your vendors, and a DJ is near the bottom. Typically, you should spend 9% of your budget on the entertainment, and for a $5000 wedding, thats about $600. That's very low for a great DJ. Here's some things to consider: Venue and food is 45%, dress and tux is 12%, Photographer is 14%, cake is 10%,

Tyrone Blue Entertainment

Posted On: Nov 07, 2009 at 7:55 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Hair and makeup is 5%, Entertainment is 9%, Rings are 4%, Honeymoon is 11%, Flowers are 10%, Ceremony and officiant is 3%, Stationary is 3%, Transportation & gifts/extras are 10%. If you have to cut somewhere, the DJ is typically first to be cut...but I ask you this question: Why is every wedding venue on the planet built around a dance floor? Think about that. It's a memory you want to have for the rest of your life... choose your priorities carefully. A wedding is your statement to the world that you are together forever, and the celebration is the expression of that statement. Where do you want to "cheap out"? If you have to cut somewhere, what is important to you... and only you can decide that. Good luck! Larry

Dan P.

Dr. D.J. Paulish Entertainment

Posted On: Nov 08, 2009 at 6:38 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Shannon, There's an assumption here that an IPOD will be much cheaper than a DJ. If you need to rent equipment, purchase music, hire an MC or sound tech, spend your personal time preparing, setting everything up, and breaking it down, I'm not sure you'll save very much. Check around with some local DJs, explain your budget situation, and ask for some quotes. You may have a problem finding someone on New Year's Eve, but you might find someone who lives near your venue, has a kind heart, and could MC your wedding and run the venue's sound system within your budget constraints. Dan

Matthew P.

Matt Potvin Photography, LLC (Camp Hill, PA)

Posted On: Nov 09, 2009 at 8:02 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
We did the laptop for our wedding, but it was a backyard wedding with 75 people, no announcements, no cake cutting announcement, everyone just gathered round, etc. So I think it partially depends on the affair that you're having. As others said, what you have on your iTunes may not be copacetic with great grandma, so you're still going to have some money to spend on applicable music. As others have said though, a DJ not only plays music in a conventional wedding. Typically we work with the DJ, who will be running the evening after you arrive at the venue. We somewhat dictate the schedule up till that time. I've shot events with bad DJ's and the downside is that people tend to get absolutely smashed because the night is dragging, which then turns into a liability for you since you were the one providing them alcohol.

guerita

Wedding: 05/15/2010

Posted On: Nov 09, 2009 at 8:25 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
We're using either an iPod or our laptop and will have a copy of the songs on CD. Our venue has a built in sound system, so it's no biggie. Our venue has done this a ton for weddings which makes me less nervous. And, since our reception is non-traditional and we have most of the music we want already, it works for us. I say go for it if your venue has a sound system and either the caterer or the venue coordinator is willing to monitor the music. Or, assign someone to help with it.

mandi

Wedding: 03/26/2010

Posted On: Nov 09, 2009 at 10:28 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I posted a discussion about this earlier: http://www.weddingwire.com/wedding-forums/be-your-own-dj/b00070b9ddc8bd74.html Hopefully this helps :)

vallynn1983

Happy Tears Weddings

Posted On: Nov 09, 2009 at 11:43 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
For some people that would work very well, just keep in mind that you would want someone to man the player so that it can be stopped and started when needed, for toasts, announcements, etc. Also, is that person okay with manning the equipment and missing out on some of the fun. I had one bride who done this and her guests took it upon theirselves to keep changing the music on their own, so keep this in mind as well.

Tyrone Blue Entertainment

Posted On: Nov 09, 2009 at 11:57 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I've noticed an interesting theme with these discussions. Many state that they are going the iPod route to save some money. That's great and I understand... but... aren't you really rolling the dice? Out of all the posts and threads, I'm still waiting for the post where a bride states that she did an iPod wedding and it was a roaring success, and the dance floor was full all night long (how many of those really happen?). Of course, I'm speaking from a DJ perspective, but I strive to give the customer every nickle of worth from my performance. I believe the energy of the night falls into the DJ's hands. A great DJ will rock the house and make you night one to remember... a bad one won't. Why do you think every wedding venue on the planet is build around a dance floor? The determining factor is how do you want your event to be remembered by your guests? If it's not that important, then you have your answer.

ScottishDJ

Accent Events

Posted On: Nov 11, 2009 at 11:12 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Couple other points. If you really want people to dance, and don't like an empty floor, then an iPod is not for you. Ipods work great for either dinner or cocktail hour music, but for dancing are limited. For a start, they play the songs in the order you designate, but don't fade from track A to track B. So, that 20 seconds at the end of a song will play until it fades away to nothing, then the next song comes in. You might have a good half minute of near silence, which gives people an excuse to leave the floor. Plus, an iPod doesn't know who's on the floor - you've maybe programmed 3 country songs in a row, because good flow is important. However, if nobody dances to the first track, a DJ wouldn't play the other 2 similar tracks, whereas the iPod just plays what's next. Music volumes change from track to track too - which a DJ would monitor and adjust, but an iPod doesn't. Some people will say they've had success, but MUCH more often than not they don't work like you hoped...

Lone Oak Photography

Posted On: Nov 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I have to agree with ScottishDJ. From the weddings I've seen very few times in which an iPod or a Computer worked well instead of a DJ. Typically, it does work well for the dinner, but if you want to get the party atmosphere, the dancing going, and to have a smooth reception I would highly recommend a DJ

Kianna

Ober Digital Media

Posted On: Nov 11, 2009 at 1:17 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I've been on both sides of the table on this one. At our wedding, we did have a good friend run the sound off his iPod. We spend our budget on other things. It worked okay for us. However, after the fact, I realized it would have been nice to have a DJ - even just for the Emcee duties. It was a little disorganized and confusing for us going from one event to another. Also, DJs keep the dance floor movin' at the weddings we've worked and kinda wish we had more of that. If you go with the iPod, at least think about having someone set up as the Emcee.

jmejg

Wedding: [Private]

Posted On: Nov 11, 2009 at 2:00 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
My friend did it and it was awesome. Everyone had a great time, and she loved that she could dance to all of the music that she and her husband liked and didn't have someone choose it for them at any point. We are going to do the same thing, as we are on a very strict budget as well.

Married: 10/17/2009

Posted On: Nov 11, 2009 at 2:03 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
ipod if you are really strapped for cash

bridetobe

Wedding: 11/27/2010

Posted On: Nov 11, 2009 at 2:11 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
As a professional event planner for over 20 years I do not recommend using your IPOD for the reception music and or ceremony music. A professional DJ will also MC your event, make important announcements and orchestrate events such as the cake cutting, garter and bouquet toss and special dances. You may not feel this is important now but I can tell you it is very important. This is not an area to skimp on. You only have one chance to make your day perfect!

ScottishDJ

Accent Events

Posted On: Nov 12, 2009 at 5:06 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I forget where I saw the statistic, but there was a survey where brides were asked after their wedding if they could go back and spend more on any ONE part of their day, what would it be. 85% said they'd spend more on the entertainment. Of course, as a wedding DJ, I'm biased towards having a GOOD DJ (not just any DJ), but I'm constantly amazed at the priorities some couples have for their big day. An extra $200 for scalloped edges on invitations, or having a chocolate fountain, e.g. sometimes take precedence over having either a DJ or Photographer - the TWO elements of a wedding that create the most memories! I get that it's a wonderful situation to be able to choose ALL your own music on an iPod, but a GOOD DJ should be able to personalize and customize your night so that it truly represents who you are as a couple - down to the songs played. If your budget won't stretch to paid entertainment, fair enough - but you MUST be aware that the alternative will very likely disappoint you.

ScottishDJ

Accent Events

Posted On: Nov 12, 2009 at 5:13 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting anyone leave out elements that make a wedding special. Chair covers, beautiful uplighting and expensive centerpieces are wonderful and enhance a wedding that has the budget for them. But I'm just saying that if budgets are tight, REALLY think about the things that will create the memories that will last a lifetime - long after the taste of Filet or chocolate cake have left your taste buds... Guests having a wonderful time, the dancefloor never empty, and the bride and groom stress-free because the day has been MCed professionally are things that last. The stunning photographs of moments in time captured by quality, creative photographers, are things that last. If you are unconvinced at the merits of expert vendors, then I apologize - you must have had some bad experiences with vendors who were unable to demonstrate their worth to you. Your day is special - work with people who understand that...

spicegirl

Blush Photo & Films

Posted On: Nov 14, 2009 at 2:15 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I would make sure you have all the right connections first. Maybe to a dry run first. I guess if you aren't looking for someone to engage your guests throughout the night, it might be a good idea. Hopefully, you'll have a self-motivated crowd to dance on their own..On the other hand you may want to assign a friend or family member to somewhat monitor music tracks throughout the evening. Best, Karen G. Blush Photo & Films

o'beggs

Wedding: 12/31/2010

Posted On: Nov 16, 2009 at 11:08 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Hi I am also getting married on New Year's Eve (2010/2011) and we are also considering using our Ipods... reasons include: small wedding for 50 guests and also we are hosting it in Thailand and we are concerned that our Thai DJ may not be able to play the right music for us. My fiance and I are from different countries (canada and uk) so our musical tastes are also different. Do people hire DJs to play their own music ever?

Tyrone Blue Entertainment

Posted On: Nov 17, 2009 at 11:36 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Here it is in a nutshell: Do you need a DJ... No. An iPod might work for you, if you don't mind an empty dance floor. Do you need a cake... No. Walmart has cake mix in isle 9. Do you need a photographer... No. You can put a disposable on every table. Do you need a planner... No. Your mom can keep notes on everything. Do you need a caterer... No. All of your girlfriends can spend the day cooking chicken wings. Do you need flowers... NO. Super America has bunches of roses for $3. Do you need a limo ride to the reception... NO. Have Uncle Harry bring his Imperial. There's always a way to save a buck here and there. Will your guests notice the difference? Probably. Will they care? Will it work for you? Maybe. What are you really looking for from this whole experience? A wedding is a one time (hopefully) experience, that fosters memories for the rest of your life. Choose your priorities.

Lyn S.

Married: 08/03/2009

Posted On: Nov 17, 2009 at 12:35 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I used an ipod for my summer wedding (~100 guests) and it was a roaring success, with the dance floor full at all times! Everyone in my family was dancing - including my father who I have NEVER seen dance! Make sure you have someone who will handle the music for you (mine was my brother). He made a playlist and pre-fixed the differences in volume of the mp3s. We had it on a laptop and we could reorganize the list and queue up the next couple of songs as we were dancing. Worked ABSOLUTELY perfectly, and I was SO glad I didn't hire a DJ! I was worried it would not work out, but after our first dance we had Signed, Sealed, Delivered (Stevie Wonder) come on and the two of us started dancing and motioned for people to join us and they did! Highly, highly recommend the ipod wedding!!!!

VinceP

Emerald Entertainment DJ

Posted On: Nov 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
My first DJ experiences were essentially the old fashion equivalent of the iPod wedding. I was the guy who always made the mix tapes for everyones parties. I had the music collection, and enjoyed putting music together in the right order. It almost never worked. Planning a playlist ahead of time with no crowd interaction to work with meant that most of the time a great song was played at the wrong time. There is no way a playlist can anticipate the ebb and flow of a party, fit in requests, and adapt to changes in mood and atmosphere. These were just house parties, with young people looking for a good time. These were not your once in a lifetime day, the day you always dreamed of. As Scottish DJ mentioned, pictures allow you to remember forever. And pictures of a full dance floor are more fun to look at than beautifully covered empty chairs. Chairs that are empty too soon because, people decided to go home early, or maybe stop for a nightcap at the hopping club nearby.

LenW

Chicago Lighting Design

Posted On: Nov 18, 2009 at 9:23 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
It's not so much the tools as it is the skill of the person running it; e.g., it's not the hammer, it's the carpenter. So if you are good at anticipating what your guests will enjoy listening to/dancing to, then do it. Remember that a dj will also do things like make announcements, coordinate with other vendors, etc. You should also consider what you want your reception to "feel" like. Depending on the style you want a dj might actually hinder that vibe.

LenW

Chicago Lighting Design

Posted On: Nov 18, 2009 at 9:38 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Or to look at it another way, do you "need" anything? You can go to the courthouse and get married in jeans and a t-shirt. You'll still be married. The question is really about priorities. Some people spend thousands on the best wedding band (music not jewelry) and get a really inexpensive photographer. Others spend 50% of their budget on flowers for the reception in the local dive bar. Know your guests, know your priorities. Can they have a good time on their own and will they enjoy without too much motivation? Then get an ipod. Will they be likely to stay glued to their chairs without massive encouragement? Then get a dj or a band.

ScottishDJ

Accent Events

Posted On: Nov 18, 2009 at 5:20 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
With respect to bride Lyn S. above, you didn't have an iPod wedding, you had someone DJing with a laptop. That's very different, and, as you discovered, a roaring success for you. You found a way to take the limitation (cost of a professional), and turn it around to work for you. The fact you have a brother who understands how to avoid all the pitfalls that an iPod wedding can bring, means that, really, your brother DJed your wedding free of charge. Many people DON'T have that knowledge, which is where the nightmare stories usually start! Having a friend or relative with the knowledge to do that is great - I'd rather couples on a budget did that - but it was NOT an iPod wedding. With an iPod you have NO control over what comes next and no way to monitor sound levels - it's just playing songs in sequence. Your way was definitely the halfway house between an iPod and hiring a professional, and I'm delighted it worked out for you both!

Lyn S.

Married: 08/03/2009

Posted On: Nov 18, 2009 at 9:50 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
ah! semantics! So we used a laptop - so what? What ipod doesn't let you change songs? A DJ would have been fun - but it was not in the budget. And if I had the money now and could turn back the clock - I wouldn't change a thing!

Tyrone Blue Entertainment

Posted On: Nov 18, 2009 at 10:44 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
There's thousands of videos on YouTube with DJ's doing amazing packed dance floor weddings. I'm still looking for one with an iPod. Semantics aside, there is a difference, and you had one of the rare success stories. One can only pat you on the back for pulling it off... Kudos!

djoneforfun

Windy City Mix

Posted On: Nov 19, 2009 at 11:54 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Well i think we are missing the point here. The original question was that he is on a tight budget and cant afford a dj. You want to use an ipod. Ok, here is my suggestion. Make several playlists and have them ready..have more than you think you need. Just in case you have to quickly change the music. Thats all! Have slow song playlist, R&B, etc. Also have a few mixed playlists and have a good friend MC the event!

FutureMrs.G

Wedding: 06/06/2010

Posted On: Nov 19, 2009 at 12:48 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
Tyrone....I'm getting the feeling that you dont really understand the issue here. There are alot of brides here that are creating special meaningful days on a very small budget many less than $5,000. Your comments are a little rude about choosing priorities etc. "Do you need a DJ... No. An iPod might work for you, if you don't mind an empty dance floor. Do you need a cake... No. Walmart has cake mix in isle 9. Do you need a photographer... No. You can put a disposable on every table. Do you need a caterer... No. All of your girlfriends can spend the day cooking chicken wings." We weren't asking you to tell us that you think the weddings we're planning arent "good" enough because we choose priorities you wouldn't. The poster was looking for recommendations because she cant afford a DJ. If you cant provide some constructive and supportive comments helping her make her decision work for her... please don't comment.

Tyrone Blue Entertainment

Posted On: Nov 19, 2009 at 2:34 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I thought I did... Knowing what I know about weddings, and knowing what I know about iPods, the original poster was asking for differences in her heading "DJ vs iPod". I was giving my professional opinion, based on what I know for sure. First, I'm not a DJ who markets my business to $5000 brides, so I was simply trying to help her avoid a disaster. I'm not trying to sell her my business concepts. I wanted her to know that almost every wedding I've ever heard of that used an iPod, was not as successful as Lyn's was... that is a rare occurrence. I was simply trying to state it nicely. BTW: YouTube has MANY iPod disaster weddings... and as I said, I've never seen a successful iPod video... have you? To state my feelings another way: is it a risk worth taking? Maybe. I believe the word "priorities" is an accurate word for the different avenues this event could go in. Based on my knowledge, only 10% of iPod weddings have the result Lyn portrayed. continued...

Tyrone Blue Entertainment

Posted On: Nov 19, 2009 at 2:36 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I'd love to discover that Shannon came back here after her wedding with an iPod, and told everyone what a great success it was... but unfortunately, when a disaster occurs, most brides are not willing to tell everyone they made a mistake. Shannon, I wish you every success with your wedding, whether it's with an iPod or a computer, or a DJ. Good luck!

LenW

Chicago Lighting Design

Posted On: Nov 19, 2009 at 4:08 PM \| Flag As Inappropriate
With all due respect, Tyrone, it is possible to have a great reception without a dj. I've seen a number of them. Did people dance? Sometimes. But dancing guests doesn't mean a great reception, just as no dancing doesn't necessarily mean failure. Different people have different definitions of success. Isn't it possible that someone can put together a few good playlists on an ipod without having years of experience? Certainly, there are amateur singers and amateur painters who are quite talented. Why can't there be amateur djs? And btw, I do have a bit of experience as a dj. I made my first $$ as one in 1979. And retired from it in 2005.

Tyrone Blue Entertainment

Posted On: Nov 20, 2009 at 12:58 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
No disrespect taken, Len. Thanks for the input. Everything you said is correct, and I agree. I'm just approaching the conversation from another direction, and I know you understand what and why I'm saying what I've said above. Thanks again!

Zach Downing

Zach Downing - Entertainer / ZachDowning.Com

Posted On: Nov 20, 2009 at 10:10 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
http://www.adja.org/general/ipodwedding.asp Today, the trendy topic is DIY receptions by using an ipod and a rented sound system instead of a professional wedding entertainer, the DJ. This idea is fraught with peril, because a great event is more than simply gear and music. It is the talent that a qualified professional brings to the event that matters most. It is what allows for a smooth flow to the event, with no embarrassing surprises. A Professional DJ from the ADJA provides you with confidence that your event will flow smoothly and will be an event that you, your family and guests will never forget, instead of one they would like to. In order to show you, the consumer the effects of using an ipod, we decided to let video tell the story. What you are about to see is real. It is video from an actual wedding where they chose to use an ipod. The video is untouched other than to insert some dialogue slides from time to time.

JAMMINDJSCO

JAMMIN' DJs - Colorado

Posted On: Nov 20, 2009 at 11:34 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
You would be surprised how affordable good DJ service actually is. Give us a call, and I can work with you on the pricing. 303-308-9700

MJ Decorations

Posted On: Nov 20, 2009 at 11:50 AM \| Flag As Inappropriate
I met with a bride last night who said her biggest goal for her wedding was good flow. She went to a big wedding last summer, and there were so many awkward pauses and unsure moments. The DJ was a guy who does club work, so his music was great, but he didn't know how to MC a wedding. I'm sure he was expensive, but he was almost like an I-pod. No narration and announcing.

Topics

Etiquette and Customs